Removing certain chemical particles from water has its advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, people need to be cautious when they use products that claim to remove fluoride from water. Fluoride is a chemical that is present in H2O and can be damaging for the health. Tooth decay is most commonly linked with exposure to fluoride. Experts believe that H2O fluoridation may lead to health risks due to certain factors.
The treatment of fluoride from H2O can be sometimes seen as worse than the actual disease it can cause. There are basically four methods used to remove this chemical aspect from H2O Treatment with aluminium based media is said to be able to remove about ninety eight percent of fluoride but the problem is about being equally very slow and this poses serious health risks to the consumers.
On the other hand, reverse osmosis can remove virtually all contaminants that can be found in H20 while distillation is also regarded as very effective since it can produce pure H20. However, the main problem often encountered is related to the slowness of the process since it takes longer and it can be difficult to be sustained for large quantities of H20 for domestic consumption. Whilst Granular Activated Carbon and KDF have proved to remove this chemical component, the main problem noted is of inconsistency in the results.
People need to be cautious of suppliers who provide products claiming to remove fluoride using only the carbon filter. The effectiveness of removal process is largely dependent on the period spent while in contact with the media. In case of high flow rates, nothing gets removed. Another consideration is regarding the nature of water itself. There is generally high PH concentration found in water coming from volcanic sources as compared to water from other natural sources.
There are many benefits and drawbacks of removing fluoride from water. Treating the water with aluminium media is a commonly used method, but is very slow and can be quite risky. On the other hand, reverse osmosis is also a very slow process but more effective.
Though effective, the distillation method is very expensive especially for smaller quantities of H20 for household needs. Granular Activated Carbon and KDF method cannot be trusted as a result of its inconsistency. The most trusted water filter kiwipure limited does not guarantee that it can remove fluoride from water hence people should be concerned about companies which claim to be capable of dealing with this challenge.
One of the most effective methods used for removing chemicals from H2O is the water filter Wellington. However, it also comes with its side effects and causes harm to health of individuals. The most reliable method has not been discovered as yet but some methods are more effective than others.
On the other hand, fluoridation can be achieved through adding chemical compounds detailed below to H20. Sodium fluoride can be handled easily but the main problem is that it is expensive for domestic purposes. Fluorosilicate acid is not expensive in terms of its actual price but the main problem is that it can be expensive to ship since it is in liquid form. Sodium fluorosilicate is cheaper to ship compared to the other chemicals. Since there are various claims suggesting the effectiveness of these methods in fluoridation, they cannot be wholly trusted since they have their own pros and cons.
There are different methods which can be implemented in the fluoridation process of H20 but the main problem encountered is related to risks associated with health care for people. As a result of many disadvantages of fluoridation, people should be weary of products that claim to remove fluoride from the water.
The treatment of fluoride from H2O can be sometimes seen as worse than the actual disease it can cause. There are basically four methods used to remove this chemical aspect from H2O Treatment with aluminium based media is said to be able to remove about ninety eight percent of fluoride but the problem is about being equally very slow and this poses serious health risks to the consumers.
On the other hand, reverse osmosis can remove virtually all contaminants that can be found in H20 while distillation is also regarded as very effective since it can produce pure H20. However, the main problem often encountered is related to the slowness of the process since it takes longer and it can be difficult to be sustained for large quantities of H20 for domestic consumption. Whilst Granular Activated Carbon and KDF have proved to remove this chemical component, the main problem noted is of inconsistency in the results.
People need to be cautious of suppliers who provide products claiming to remove fluoride using only the carbon filter. The effectiveness of removal process is largely dependent on the period spent while in contact with the media. In case of high flow rates, nothing gets removed. Another consideration is regarding the nature of water itself. There is generally high PH concentration found in water coming from volcanic sources as compared to water from other natural sources.
There are many benefits and drawbacks of removing fluoride from water. Treating the water with aluminium media is a commonly used method, but is very slow and can be quite risky. On the other hand, reverse osmosis is also a very slow process but more effective.
Though effective, the distillation method is very expensive especially for smaller quantities of H20 for household needs. Granular Activated Carbon and KDF method cannot be trusted as a result of its inconsistency. The most trusted water filter kiwipure limited does not guarantee that it can remove fluoride from water hence people should be concerned about companies which claim to be capable of dealing with this challenge.
One of the most effective methods used for removing chemicals from H2O is the water filter Wellington. However, it also comes with its side effects and causes harm to health of individuals. The most reliable method has not been discovered as yet but some methods are more effective than others.
On the other hand, fluoridation can be achieved through adding chemical compounds detailed below to H20. Sodium fluoride can be handled easily but the main problem is that it is expensive for domestic purposes. Fluorosilicate acid is not expensive in terms of its actual price but the main problem is that it can be expensive to ship since it is in liquid form. Sodium fluorosilicate is cheaper to ship compared to the other chemicals. Since there are various claims suggesting the effectiveness of these methods in fluoridation, they cannot be wholly trusted since they have their own pros and cons.
There are different methods which can be implemented in the fluoridation process of H20 but the main problem encountered is related to risks associated with health care for people. As a result of many disadvantages of fluoridation, people should be weary of products that claim to remove fluoride from the water.
About the Author:
Looking to find a water filter in Wellington? Then visit www.kiwipure.com for the best advice on water filters for you.
No comments:
Post a Comment